> Given almost infinite time, what you'll probably end up with is a
> large amount of small objects, each taking a pixel (or several), which
> will only make sense when looking from a specific point in 3D space.
> You can do that with a single iteration so why bother? :)

Certainly true if only one perspective is used. Sorry, I wasn't clear... I
was considering using at least 3 photos of the same object under similar
lighting conditions taken ideally at equal intervals around the object and
comparing all of them to the model...

The original idea for this was effectively a poor mans digitiser using an
algorithm to make up for not being able to afford to build proper sensing
equipment, with the hope of arriving at a more 'real looking' model of a
complex object that would otherwise be practical...

Thanks for the input, :)

Luke

Post a reply to this message