|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trf de> wrote in message
news:3c42cc35@news.povray.org...
> In article <rsJ### [at] econym demon co uk> , Mike Williams
> <mik### [at] nospam please> wrote:
>
> > Isosurfaces *much* slower in beta 7?
> > (isosurfaces with "evaluate" are now very slow)
> > http://news.povray.org/3bdf24b3$1@news.povray.org
>
> Excuse me, but I am slowly getting upset you continue to fail to take this
> off the list. There is no point in keeping a list of bugs if you keep
> things on there that have been explained as user errors several times...
>
> Thorsten
I tried following all of the threads pertaining to this. I'm still confused
and/or just not remembering everything correctly. For clarity, is 'evaluate'
deprecated? (i.e. unnecessary from the user's perspective) Or, are there cases
where it might still be useful but, as with some other features, one can -- and
should -- expect it to be slower?
If so, then, in Mike's defense; until the documentation is updated doesn't its
presence here keep the changes from being continually re-reported as a bug?
--
light_source{0,1}#macro c(J,a)sphere{0,1pigment{rgb z}scale a translate J+O}
#end#macro B(R,V,O)c(0,4)intersection{c(V,R)difference{c(-z*4x+10)c(-z*4.1x+
10)c(0<7.5,45,5>)}}#end B(12,0z*25)B(8y*4<0,12,50>) // Batronyx ^"^
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |