> How could it render with pov 3.1g when there wasn't isosurface in 3.1 ?
> You are talking probably about MegaPOV but you shouldn't expect exactly
the same
> behavour becouse megapov was only _unofficial_ set patches

You are totally right

> Have you included "functions.inc" to this script ?

Uuuuu.... No, I didn't (first time I hear about this file)

> > Is it a real problem or am I completely off-topic ?
>
> not completly but almost :-)

Hem. Thanks but I DO am completely off-topic. Sorry for this unnecessary
thread.

Post a reply to this message