On 7 Dec 2001 07:17:47 -0500, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:

>Angelo 'kENpEX' Pesce <ken### [at] uniplanit> wrote:
>:>  This just says that the Codewarrior debugger is better than gdb. I have
>:>no objections to that. I have never used that debugger, but if you say it's
>:>better, I have no reason to not to believe you.
>:>  However, the fact that there exist debuggers that are better than gdb
>:>doesn't make the latter "bad".
>
>: "  A properly configured Emacs and a proper knowledge of makefiles is
>: the best
>: IDE one may wish."
>
>: Being the "best" should mean that no other thing is better than it...
>
>  I think that "IDE" and "debugger" are two different things.
Integrated Development Environment... That means editor, compiler,
linker, debugger, profiler... Of course if U think that emacs is an
IDE, then surely a debugger is not a part of your IDE :P

Post a reply to this message