In article <Aw3XzMAc$rC8EwKy@econym.demon.co.uk> , Mike Williams 
<mik### [at] nospamplease>  wrote:

>>It is fixed.  The other problems with isosurfaces may obscure the fix in
>>scenes which exhibit the other problem as well.
>
> I did some timings, and on my machine isosurfaces with "evaluate" still
> run very nearly as slowly as they did in beta 7, and *much* more slowly
> than the same isosurfaces without "evaluate".

Well, did I say they would be as fast or did i say the fix might be obscured
to the user because of the other problems?  The problem *is* fixed, no
matter how long you argue it isn't because I have the source code and know
what I changed...

    Thorsten

Post a reply to this message