In article <3c07b5e6@news.povray.org> , "Rune" <run### [at] mobilixnetdk>
wrote:

>> Well, as it worked this way every since there has
>> been POV-Ray, how can it be a bug?
>
> Why do some people keep saying that? Just because something worked the same
> way in POV-Ray 3.1, it doesn't mean it can't be a bug. In fact POV-Ray 3.1
> has some quite serious bugs, such as the normal bug.

I said it works this way "every since there has been POV-Ray", ***not***
that it always worked this way only in POV-Ray 3.1.  How about actually
reading what I say before picking on it???

>> However, as it hasn't been needed in 15 years
>
> That's not for any individual to say. Maybe *you* didn't need it...

Please don't take half of my sentence away and then put words in my mouth.
I said "However, as it hasn't been needed in 15 years and I don't remember a
patch for it or any suggestion for such a patch." and it is quite obvious
what I mean if you read the sentence and maybe the whole paragraph to the
*end*.

>> I really wonder why it would be an feature so important
>> it has to be added to 3.5 (so to post here)
>
> Well, here I agree. It's not that important... But he may have a point that
> it maybe should be mentioned in the docs.

Actually, I think the docs mention that the colors are clipped somewhere.  I
have to admit I don't know where from memory and I don't have time to look
right now...

    Thorsten

Post a reply to this message