"Peter Popov" <pet### [at] vipbg> wrote in message
news:5rk90ugsq4q3mas9a780eqtq0k36a5edcj@4ax.com...

> Because IMHO an iso would be the easiest way to do what you want to
> do.

Easiest in what way?
To me is easier to collect the point coordinates and build a mesh (I think
:/)
And wouldn't it need muuuuch more processing power to render it using
isosurfaces?

Best regards.

Post a reply to this message