Yep, that did the trick!  Thanks for the suggestions everyone.

--
Skip
Trevor Quayle <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3bf2cd85$1@news.povray.org...
> I think I found it, try adjusting accuracy in the iso (default is 0.001,
> 0.0001 appeared ok)
>
> -tgq
>
> "Skip Talbot" <sta### [at] uiucedu> wrote in message
> news:3bf2c8de$1@news.povray.org...
> > I tried a max_gradient of 2000 and got the same results.  A
> max_trace_level
> > of 10000 did not help either.  I'll post the cloud to p.t.s-f when its
> > completed.  I'm using it for my bomber scenes.
> >
> > --
> > Skip
> > Ruy <ruy### [at] hipernetcombr> wrote in message
> news:3bf29dab@news.povray.org...
> > > Did you try  to use "evaluate" in order to find out the proper
> > > "max_gradient"? If not, take a look at the docs, specifically 6.5.4.
> > > Although you increased it, the ammount might still be insuficient (the
> > > largest number I've had to use in one of my isosurfaces was 248). If
> it's
> > > not that, then I don't have a clue.
> > >
> > > BTW, nice cloud. Do you intend to post the source?
> > >
> > > Ruy
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message