|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmx de> wrote in message
news:3BD497ED.186AC546@gmx.de...
>You could also try glass or something with subsurface
> scattering.
Glass or subsurfscat, you must be mad ;-) It already renders at less then
4pps with the aa and rad settings turned up, I think I'll go for stone,
seems the more sensible option, at least to get it rendered this year anyway
:-)
Kev
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |