|
|
"Chaps" <cha### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:3bd0297a@news.povray.org...
> Hi philippe, I'm not certain to really understand what you are looking
for.
>
> I don't understand why union is better than difference. In this case, as
> there are many
> coincident surfaces, I would use a merge.
Speed.
Coincident surfaces are a problem indeed. I still do not knwo how I will
solve that.
>
> Anyway I wrote this, it seems to work.
>
Thanks.
I was actually thinking about something more general. I am working (slowly)
on an explanatory example...
Povingly,
Philippe
Post a reply to this message
|
|