"Warp" wrote:
>   Perhaps it could be better to define the supercone so
> that it just takes the for radiuses and a height, and
> then it would create the object centered in the origin
> and along the y-axis (so that one end is at the origin
> and the other is at y*height). The user can then
> transform it with the transformation macros from other
> includes. Would this be a good idea?

I really don't think so. I've been using the macro a bit, and the things
I've used it for would sure be much more clumsy and complicated if I had to
align it manually. No feature change thank you, just the bug fix! ;)

Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World:    http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated June 26)
POV-Ray Users:   http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk

Post a reply to this message