|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I am no Rhino expert, but wouldnt this mesh problem be solved with a smooth
command ?
That would add more triangles to the mesh but as i see the problem it would
help a lot.
Normally i would not recommend a product that costs US$ 975 (iirc) , but
there's a free trial version with 25 saves. I think 25 it's enough for
smoothing some poses and trying it in POV, ahn ?
Will
PS: The URL is www.rhino3d.com .
"Gilles Tran" <tra### [at] inapg inra fr> escreveu na mensagem
news:3bcc5cfc$1@news.povray.org...
> 3bcb7bf1@news.povray.org...
> > Actually, I was going to suggest that you swap intervals and samples.
You
> > should also be able to make do with much less than 50. My candle uses 5.
> No, it doesn't work in that case. Lowering the samples number just creates
> more visible and uglier artifacts. Increasing them (up to 200) doesn't fix
> the wireframe artifacts either, and just makes the render crawl.
> It was just a test anyway. Temporary conclusion is that using this
technique
> with meshes has serious limitations but that it can be very valuable in
> certain circumstances.
>
> G.
>
>
> --
>
> **********************
> http://www.oyonale.com
> **********************
> - Graphic experiments
> - POV-Ray and Poser computer images
> - Posters
>
> >
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |