"Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
news:3b9a8140@news.povray.org...
> Oh, sorry! I thought, that it reported the line number in which the object
> was first declared. But as I see now there was no line number in 3.1 at
all.
> I stumbled over this, because an old scene of mine reported several
missing
> pigments in line with only on "object"-statement. Those line numbers don't
> help that much, but they are of course better then the behaviour in 3.1.

It is certainly more noticeable in 3.5 than with 3.1g :-)

-Ian

Post a reply to this message