"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:3B9A8208.726A47FF@pacbell.net...
> I issued a bugreport a long time ago about no line number given for no
> pigment warnings in v3.1g. I presume this is the fix that Ron had
> promised. He mentioned that it was not an easy thing to do. For example
> if your no pigment warning comes from deep within a deeply nested loop
> isolating the exact location and giving a line warning is extrememly
> difficult to isolate. It may create more overhead than is acceptable
> to get this level of error checking.

Oh reeeeeeeealy?

I figured it'd be sort of easy to grab a line number from a script file, but
I dunno.  Can anyone give me a more technical explaination (Ron?)?  Pretty
please?

-Ian

Post a reply to this message