Oh, well, yours is far more complete! My 20 lines macro can't compete.
Surely the math involved is the same (I can't understand why people are
frightened by the simplest trig formulae). Here trace() cannot be handy,
because there's no problem about overlapping. BTW, if the angle of a book is
forced to be greater than the previous one, then you get a boring but
physically correct result (just like the queue with no randomness in my
image).

Jonathan.

"Gilles Tran" <tra### [at] inapginrafr> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3B74F5B0.BE41BBAC@inapg.inra.fr...
> JRG wrote:
>
> > Well, this macro worked for me, and it looks quite physically realistic.
>
> You could try having a look at mine, to see how they compare.
> http://www.oyonale.com/ressources/english/sources07.htm
>
> G.
>
>
> --
>
> **********************
> http://www.oyonale.com
> **********************
> Graphic experiments
> Pov-ray gallery
>
>

Post a reply to this message