> I get this really narly blank page.

That's intended, I like to go for a artistic minamilest design when building
web pages.

>(No, I don't care for flash at all).

I know some people don't, why not for you? It's true that there are a lot of
poorly implimented flash sites out there with nothing but cheesy animations
and sounds and no content. But a well executed flash site can take your
breath away, take a look at this one:

http://www.gabocorp.com/bumper.4/

Have your speakers on!

> Perhaps a non-flash imagemapped version would be just as effective?

Perhaps when I have everything finished I will do that. But so far the flash
version is comming along nicely for me so it might be a while before I get
the non flash one up. The whole site will not be in flash.

> Yann
>
> Thomas Lake wrote:
>
> > I've finally decided to redesign my old site, haven't touched it in over
2
> > years, and upload many of my new images. I decided to go with a Pov
> > inspired interface, at least with the front page. Please take a look and
> > tell me what you think, you need the Flash plugin. There isn't anything
> > there beyond the front page for now.
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/~thomaslake/test.htm
> >
> > Below are the two images I rendered for this. The pure black and white
one
> > took about 5 min to render and the colour one took over 2 1/2 days, can
> > anyone explain this huge discrepancy? I've used rather high radiosity
> > settings, but both images use the same settings.

Post a reply to this message