"j charter" <jrc### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:3B4F9E2C.103EB136@aol.com...
> On the castle I think the portacullis ( sp? ) needs more work.  And
related I
> guess, the entrance to the bridge.  That is really the focal point of the
whole
> narrative it seems.  It should tell us what we are to make of the
juxtaposed
> elements.  Luscious grass at the edge of a bluff overlooking a sea of
lava, a
> castle on a lone promentory, accessible only by footbridge.  We look to
the
> start of the bridge for a clue.  If it is meant to be plain and offering
no
> clues, then it should be more intentionally plain, not just a couple of
very
> regular looking cylinders

I was trying to make the bridge as dirty and realistic as possible - the
cylinders got the least work - if I get some time I'll dabble with some
iso's and see what I can make.  I must admit though I don't know what
'portacullis' nor 'juxtaposed' mean?

Peter Cracknell

Post a reply to this message