"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote :
>
> A central point and a ring of six you mean?  They should probably be
> weighted less the farther away.  For overkill you could do another ring
> of twelve around that...

    Well, thinking about it (and admitting that I have no skill at such
things) it would seem that the radius of the object would normally be
enough. If the object is unusually shaped it might be a problem, but for the
most part, if you place an object on an irregular surface, the points where
it touches are what determine the orientation, not the point under the
center.

Post a reply to this message