|
 |
In article <3B45805F.B25AD44A@sycomore.fr> , Adrien Beau
<adr### [at] sycomore fr> wrote:
> I've heard some horror stories about compiling kernel 2.4.6
> with gcc 3.0.0.0.0. Why can't people wait for stable, proven
> versions?
If it isn't stable and released than it is called alpha or beta, not final.
GCC 3.0 is final, so it is stable. If it is not, then it is from M$ ;-)
Alternatively, it is just incompetence of the authors - their own list for
testing included the Linux kernel...
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
