|
 |
I use good old photoshop. Is it good at compression?
Norbert
"Jamie Davison" <jam### [at] ntlworld com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:MPG.158f403cc9c2fe6b989943@news.povray.org...
> > a minor update for my random nature pic.
> > I changed lights, some textures and added or exchanged some plants.
>
> Very pretty, and a definite improvement on the last image.
>
> > peak mem 669 MB (near collapse)
>
> Ouch! My HDD is groaning just imagining the amount of thrashing that
> must have gone on...
>
> > Not very good, but it looks less artificial now.
>
> I beg to differ. At least as far as the first point goes.
>
> > As JRG in the foregoing thread did I rendered it in 1024*768 to show
more
> > detail. Some is lost through jpeg compression, but more than 250 kb
> > allowed, as you know.
>
> What are you using to do the compression? Some compressors can get
> better image quality than others for the same file size.
>
> Bye for now,
> Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
