You are right, radiosity would be good to add some depth to the trees.
But I will change the trees, add isosurfaces and hopfully will use
scattering media.
Therefore radiosity with many scene objects is for people with GHz machines
and DDRDRAM (or Rambus).
Just for fun I will try a small render with the simplest settings.

And, yes, there should be a lake behind the trees. I have to change
something there.

Norbert



Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
3B0F6455.BC08AA6C@gmx.de...
>
> That really looks good, especially the water.  The trees look quite
> uniform in the upper parts, radiosity would be interesting for that, but
> probably could be extremely slow.
>
> The far parts of the scene look somehow strange, as if there is a double
> horizon, the left part extends much further than the right.  If there
> should be some lake behind the trees, it would help if the actual horizon
> would be visible between the trees.
>
> Christoph
>
> --
> Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
> IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
> things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message