|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Elias Pschernig" <eli### [at] aon at> wrote:
>Thanks, I will use that. I wanted to avoid a new variable at first, but
it's a lot
>better than the +0.
Why did you want to avaid a new variable, though? (And you actually werent
avoiding any - #local always creates a new variable.) For elegance? Because
of the memory requirements? A single new vector variable has a neglible
cost in a recursive macro or anywhere else, for that matter.
Just curious,
-- Nikodemus
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |