"Rick [Kitty5]" <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote in message
news:3afd4ad4@news.povray.org...
> I would suggest many many smaller flowers that perhaps curve upwards a
> little more, and perhaps with out the HF below the flower being visible -
> only on the petals

How about a picture of someone else too?  For now I'm using a sample photo
from some scanner software.

File size is over the limit for here, being 860KB, so it is at:
http://webpages.charter.net/omniverse/flwrgirltrace.mpg

The flowers start out as buds, although so small that might not be obvious,
then they flatten out.  Needs stems added, and more height variation too
except shadows are a problem.

Bob H.

Post a reply to this message