"Geoff Wedig" <wed### [at] darwinepbicwruedu> wrote in message
news:3acc871f@news.povray.org...
>
> Hmm, not certain why you're even bothering with an iso.  The distance and
> wave size mean that a surface normal would probably be more than
sufficient
> for this image, even if blown up to a very large size.

Huh?  :-)  Oh!  You think the water is an isosurface!  Ha ha.  Well no, it
is not.

> Also, I wonder why you are using blurred reflection, since reflections on
> water are pretty sharp.  If you want the blurring, then I'd think you'd
want
> rougher water, not blurred reflec.  So I guess I wonder why you're using
> these features in this instance.

The blurring is taking place of mere normals or displacement (isosurface?).
Figured I'd give it a try for effect.  I have to change the amounts the
three water textures have I can tell because it doesn't have smooth and
rough areas like it had before.

Thanks, glad you liked it anyway.

Bob H.

Post a reply to this message