|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Bob H. <omn### [at] msn com> wrote:
> Main reason for posting this Bryce-like ?ender is to say that this went very
> normally until the last 20 lines or so. It took a couple hours (or less) to
> get to the part where the reflection of the nearby hillside shows up in the
> water. From there it was doing one line every few minutes and steadily got
> slower.
> I do very little with reflection_blur but I suspect that could be why, the
> combination of it and isosurface. No kidding, huh?
> Some 4 hours to finish for this size, was hoping to get a much larger one
> made quicker, once it's ready. Not so sure now :-)
Hmm, not certain why you're even bothering with an iso. The distance and
wave size mean that a surface normal would probably be more than sufficient
for this image, even if blown up to a very large size.
Also, I wonder why you are using blurred reflection, since reflections on
water are pretty sharp. If you want the blurring, then I'd think you'd want
rougher water, not blurred reflec. So I guess I wonder why you're using
these features in this instance.
It's a very nice pic, all the same.
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |