|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
The colors look very strange to me. It kind of reminds me of those old
movies in black and white that are touched up with color. The whole fish
looks like it is made in two tones (orange and off white). Wouldn't real
clay have a bit more variety than that (I mean like a little variation in
the shades of orange because it dried differently)? Maybe it would help the
overall appearance if it were on a textured plane instead of a white one.
Stephen
"Rune" <run### [at] iname com> wrote in message
news:3ac76763@news.povray.org...
> A lot has been changed since the last version. I've made hundreds of small
> changes to the model, so the whole shape of it is rather different, which
is
> pretty obvious if you compare to the last version.
>
> Of course the most obvious change is the lighting w/radiosity. TonyB set
up
> this for me and I'm very satisfied with the result, which I think improves
> the photorealism a lot. He also kindly rendered the image for me on his
> computer which is many times faster than mine.
>
> The radiosity also makes the scene much slower though, so before TonyB
sent
> me the final version I didn't know how the normals looked up close. I'm
> afraid they look a bit flat and fake; I almost have to do something about
> that.
>
> But overall I think this version is much better than the last one. :)
>
> What do you think?
>
> Rune
> --
> \ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
> / The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
> \ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated March 29)
> / Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |