What you've done so far looks really good, considering that height fields
are always a little jagged. There are two things you can do to smooth it out
a little: First, try using the "smooth" keyword. This may also give you
undesirable results if you need sharp edges. Second, use the highest
resolution image possible for your height field source. If the source image
is higher resolution than the rendered image, you can minimize the jaggies.

-Dave

"Spock" <spo### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message news:3aabf932@news.povray.org...
> Well, I hope not :-)
>
> Attached is a simple example of a music logo generated from a height
field.
> Not very exciting, but I think the method has potential.
>
> A question for the experts:  Any ideas on how I can minimize the rough
edges
> that seem to be intrinsic to this method?

Post a reply to this message