Chris Huff <chr### [at] maccom> wrote:

> In article <3a9bf4b5@news.povray.org>, Geoff Wedig 
> <wed### [at] darwinepbicwruedu> wrote:

>> Ah.  Thanks.  I was looking for pass_through, per Chris's post, which is
>> photons.  I wonder if this should be made consistent... Not entirely sure
>> they do the same thing, though.

> I meant projected_through. And they don't do the same thing, 
> pass_through behaves more like shadowless (or maybe I mean no_shadow? 
> Those two *do* need to be made more consistent...), while 
> projected_through does a fancy spot light.

Yeah, that's kinda what I thought.  Now I just have to experiment to see if
my fancy method will work or not.

Geoff

Post a reply to this message