Why not just "point_at" and zoom in?

Grim
"Josh English" <eng### [at] spiritonecom> wrote in message
news:3A756C47.B0C22C9D@spiritone.com...
> Yeah, that was the gist of it. If the image is (for example) 1000 by 1000
> pixels, and I tell it to render a subset, the final image is still 1000 by
1000
> pixels. If I had the memory available to me, I'd render the huge scene
file and
> then find another cheap way to print it.
>
> Josh
>
> GrimDude wrote:
>
> > DOH! again! :) You mean output a cropped image? I don't think so.
> >
> > Grim
> > "GrimDude" <gri### [at] netzerocom> wrote in message
> > news:3a727610@news.povray.org...
> > > Isn't this done by using the +sc +sr +ec +er commands?
> > >
> > > DOH! Just researching this and I learn about the bit-depth switch!
Reading
> > > the docs is a good thing! :)
> > >
> > > Grim
> > > "Josh English" <eng### [at] spiritonecom> wrote in message
> > > news:3A70391D.168A862B@spiritone.com...
> > > > I have an image that I want to print out on a very large scale and
get
> > > > decent printing resolution, and I also hope to print a few scenes on
> > > > polyhedra cutouts (just for fun). All that is secondary. My real
> > > > question is if my image size is, say 800 by 600, and I want to
render
> > > > rows 20 through 80 and columns 200 by 300 (or any subregion, really)
I
> > > > get a final image size of 800 by 600 pixels, most of it blank, with
only
> > > > rows 20 through 80 and columns 200 by 300 filled in.
> > > > Is it possible to get POV-Ray to give me an image 61 pixels high and
101
> > > > pixels across when rendering like this?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Josh English -- Lexiphanic Lethomaniac
> > > > eng### [at] spiritonecom
> > > > The POV-Ray Cyclopedia http://www.spiritone.com/~english/cyclopedia/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
> --
> Josh English -- Lexiphanic Lethomaniac
> eng### [at] spiritonecom
> The POV-Ray Cyclopedia http://www.spiritone.com/~english/cyclopedia/
>
>

Post a reply to this message