"Rick [Kitty5]" <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote in message
news:3a77eb48@news.povray.org...
>
> > Motion Blur does provide smooth transition between frames. And it is
> > essential for the realism.
> > In addition, with motion blur you do not need as much frames to produce
> > smooth motion.
>
> exactly what i was thinking.
>
> none of you mentioned that it looks cool as well though :))
>
And that too :)  but I was looking at the 'natural Aristotelian' functional
side of things :O
I remember years ago a neat raytracer that supported animations.  Each frame
had motion blur of the moving animated object.  This was done automatically
as a built in capability in the raytracer.
Keyframing something is not enough at times.  Unless we can have a built in
motion blur of moving objects.  The difference is between, well, animating
an object, and.......making it move :)
Maan

Post a reply to this message