A. Jans-Beken,
Can you repost that quickres file?

--
Thanks,
C.J. - POV User
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
news:3A68D400.F3192FCF@faricy.net...
> "A. Jans-Beken" wrote:
>
> > Just a tip :-)
> >
> > My experience is that rendering pictures in 16:9 format can add to the
> > "impact" a picture makes. This can be simply done by changing the camera
> > object where the aspect ratio is normaly 5/4. Just change it to 16/9 and
> > change the rendering size to 16:9 or a multiple of that: 160:90,
> > 320:180, 640:360, etc.
> >
> > Between words: widescreen motion pictures use 2.35:1 I never used it
> > however. Maybe someone can posts some examples here.
>
> Yep. Actually I think 16:9 is wide, 2.35:1 is "cinema". Or at least in the
> Goldeneye video options. :)
> The default is actually 4:3, not 5:4.
> Other good ratios are tau (~1.618:1), the golden ratio, 2.5:1, panoramic?,
> and 4:5.
>
> Gilles Tran has some great renders at 2.5:1,
> http://www.mediaport.net/Artichaud/Tran/gtran.en.html
> I have a render in tau, a render in 5:4 (vertical 4:5), and the mc escher
> gallery is square, http://davidf.faricy.net/raygall.html
>
> --
> David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
> My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/
>
>

Post a reply to this message