OK .. i've to admit, that these pics are optimized for jpg ...
here is a high-res version (2048x1536):
http://www.informatik.uni-halle.de/~walzer/borg_high.jpg
it is jpg with 10% compression (quality 90%) and and it still eats my nice
sharp edges and colors them ...
but I think it's better than a 4,5MB PNG ....
Comments ??? (of course not to jpg)
--
Jan Walzer
Post a reply to this message
|