"Scott Hill" <sco### [at] innocentcom> wrote...
>
>     I thought an improved implementation might be on the cards at some
> point - which was why I went on to give my opinion of what is wrong with
> MegaPOVs implementation - as a programmer myself, I feel that such public
> and open scrutinization and discussion of an applications feature set,
> limitations and bugs can only benefit future developments of the
> application - after all who's in a better position to assess software than
> the users of the said software ?

I agree.  My response was based on the issue that sometimes users are under
the impression that their suggestions will immediately become features.
This, unfortunately, is usually not possible.  I realize that you understand
the difficulty and therefore have a realistic view of the situation, so I
appreciate the discussion and suggestions.

In light of that, I wanted to let all the other users know why the
implementation will stay the way it is, despite the fact that I agree with
you that it could be improved.

-Nathan

Post a reply to this message