Yeah, It could be this easy:
translucent{
rgb<.3 .9 .4>
distance 2
blur_radius 3
samples 50
}
St. wrote:
Maybe 'translucent' could be a
> new keyword..?
>
> I would like to think so.
--
Samuel Benge
stb### [at] hotmail com
See my website@: http://www.goldrush.com/~abenge/Top/index.html
Post a reply to this message
|