Yeah, It could be this easy:

translucent{
  rgb<.3 .9 .4>
  distance 2
  blur_radius 3
  samples 50
}

St. wrote:

Maybe 'translucent' could be a
> new keyword..?
> 
>    I would like to think so.


-- 
Samuel Benge

stb### [at] hotmailcom
See my website@: http://www.goldrush.com/~abenge/Top/index.html

Post a reply to this message