I agree with you, I really do. I was concerned because a while back 
there was this big discussion here about positng nudity.  Somebody 
posted some beautiful images of a nude woman posing among these dense 
meandering nests of post-industrial pipes...
I don't remember much about it except that it seemed at the time that 
artistic nudity was acceptable, but we should say something. I suppose, 
to be entirely PC (Postically Correct), we should post a warning for 
violent or potentially violent images.  Of course, everyone is 
potentially naked...

Thank you for the empathy

Bill


Apache wrote:

>Seems like you're afraid that people will die if they see the skin of the
>upper part of a human/female body.
>Today I saw all kinds of naked bodies:
> - 187 doves (one runover by a car, but still no clothes)
> - 17 dogs (1 wore a hat, maybe against the sun)
> - 8 cats
> - 3 fish
> - 2 turtles
> - 25 crows
> - 36.5 sparrows (one dead sparrow, half but naked)
> - 1 mouse
> - lots of insects.
>
>And I'm still alive! I even managed to survive several attacks caused by
>viewing naked folks. Unbelievable. I don't worry about seeing people with
>guns on tv that kill eachother and people hitting eachother with fists and
>sometimes very useful tools like bats, sticks, hammers and sometimes chairs
>or tables. And for the children we have cartoons showing characters hitting
>eachother, shooting eachother and we have the A-team also. And why do those
>children survive? Because there are no nude people, except for Donald Duck
>and and some other cartoon characters that really should wear pants. The
>nefews of Donald Duck don't wear pants, isn't that offensive!
>
>
>  
>

Post a reply to this message