Christoph Hormann wrote:

> In any case the whole thing is somewhat pointless since the image itself
> is no more copyrighted probably and therefore you could just go to Tate
> and take a photo if you want (they probably don't allow taking photos but
> they could do nothing more than expel you when you do it anyway).

That's right. The painting itself is not copyrighted anymore (it happens after
70 or 100 years as far as I remember). But the reproduction in the book is
copyrighted.

> My advice: Put the image on a webserver and restrict access and give the
> password to those working on the project.  AFAIK this would be
> non-problematic in terms of copyright in most countries.

Unfortunetly I don't have such resources.

Gena.

Post a reply to this message