Apache wrote:
> 
> The method is far from perfect, but here is the c code I wrote. I have been
> thinking of a better way, because there there are some faint plateaus in the
> distribution and we don't want that. I guess some smart jittering will get
> rid of the plateaus. The algorithm is VERY SLOW, so I'm afraid that coding
> it in pov SDL is completely useless!
> 
> (Code attached to this post. file extension is .cpp, but the code itself is
> ANSI C.)

You know you should not post binary attachments in a non binary group...

Apart from that - it looks like a regular distribution.  No matter how
uniform it is this is usually a bad idea.  Most of the computations seems
to be required for sorting the samples - this can be removed when you
generate the precise number of samples you need.

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 28 Feb. 2003 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______

Post a reply to this message