|
|
Mael wrote:
>
> > Side note : all those images have the 0 1 clipping done by pov on
> prediction
> > value (IMHO this clipping should be removed..)
>
> Same parameters, with rotational gradient, (so compare to
> cornell_rad_eb.5c450_halton_rotgrad.png) but with no clipping (the 'light'
> is rgb 1 ambient 7.8)
> http://195.221.122.126/gradients/cornell_rad_eb.5c450_rotgrad_noclipping.png
This complies with the observations i made, the difference is not much
visible in most cases but it can lead to problems in special situations
like bright ambient objects or light sources. See for example:
http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/files/rad_clip.png
http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/files/rad_no_clip.png
I think a switch for turning clipping on or off will be a good idea, i
planned something like that too.
Concerning rotational vs. translational gradients - as i already said i
think both have their uses. I'd probably also introduce a switch for that
and make some more testing in practice. Note that the gradients are not
stored in the rad cache file right now anyway.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 28 Feb. 2003 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|