Alastair Murray wrote:
> Wow, I wasn't really expecting you to actually do it. Anyway, it looks> quite cool - but is the render time for each frame very high?
Up to nine hours.
> As the only flaw with the animation is> it is very jumpy (especially when most of the flesh is disappearing at it's> quickest, half-way through the 'growth' cycle).
This is because all the flesh has the same x-ray density, so when the
cutoff gets below that, it all appears at once.
/Ib
