I have tried it... Several times... It just does not function well for me... I
am not into playing around with software to try to get it to work... Mega works
just fine for me... If you are wondering what problems i have had, they are
similar or the same as other user posts on here regarding 9.2... =[ I just do
not think it is in tip top shape and im not a programing genius or i would do
some investigating... I barley understand the basics of C++ right now... =]

Sorry i was wrong in my thinking but i thought someone had wrote me a message
explaining how 3.5 was going to be the cross over to C++... I do not remember
who or when but if i am terribly bored sometime i will go through all the old
messages and try to sort out my "misconception"... =]

Me... =]

Ken wrote:

> Ryan Mooney wrote:
> >
> > I thought that 3.5 was supposed to be the upgrade from c to c++...??
>
> That was a misconception on your part.
>
> > Being a patch upgrade explains allot...
>
> In what way?
>
> > I will stick with trusty 3.1g in mega  version... =]
>
> You are welcome to do so but I think you are missing the point. Most of the
> change made for v3.5 were based on the patches in Megapov. The advantages
> of v3.5 are that many of the patches were poorly written or badly implemented
> within the program. The POV-Team cleaned them up and in many cases improved
> the features that Megapov offered. While there were a couple of popular
> features in Megapov that did not make the cut, glows for example, there is
> more than enough in v3.5 to warrant the upgrade. Don't sell v3.5 short
> without at least trying it. Your trusty v3.1g Mega version is a developmental
> dead end.
>
> --
> Ken Tyler

Post a reply to this message