Christoph Gerber wrote:
> 
> This is the final version of my landscape project (not meant for the current
> IRTC round because it's not a real place).

You are not going to submit it?

I would really consider it.  The fact that it's not a real place is no
argument IMO, a lot of others won't be either and why does a 'spectacular
landscape' have to be real?

> [...]
> The drawback of the combination of isosurface rock, media sky and radiosity
> is rendering time: the scene took allmost  40 hours to render at 1024x768 on
> my 1.7 GHz P4. 

I don't see much from the radiosity, you could probably have achieved the
same or better effect with a fill light, at least for the rock.

> Hope it was worth the electricity costs ...

What a luck i don't have to pay per kWh...

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,                 
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/  
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______

Post a reply to this message