|
|
Gilles Tran wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, but image has some basic 'mistakes' - like to low AA wisible i.e. on
> > ladders.
>
> "mistakes" like this (if they are indeed mistakes) do not matter when the
> image has clearly a superior artistic quality, which is the case.
> They only matter on bad pics in fact, because they just make them worse...
> Believe me, when I saw this round, there was absolutely no doubt whatsoever
> that this image would win.
And apart from that with a bit of knowledge about how POV-Ray works or if
you read the text file you could notice that rendering this kind of scene
is quite a computational problem. It's easy to nitpick about the
technical limitations of an image if you don't have to render it.
I don't think the technical rating in the IRTC is always optimal, but for
this picture it seems perfectly justified (if not too low).
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|