Well I started this as a way to unwind after my last irtc entry. Not
sure quite what is the appeal of reconstructing a master's painting.
There is something vaguely archaeological about it.
Approximating the objects and their placement was relatively easy, which
is a credit to the observational powers of Peiter Claesz. Figuring out
the lighting is trickier, and texturing is probably very open to
interpretation.
This was all csg or iso's.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'take1.jpg' (36 KB)
Preview of image 'take1.jpg'
![take1.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C3D7F7ABB.1000609%40aol.com%3E/take1.jpg?preview=1)
|