Well I started this as a way to unwind after my last irtc entry.  Not 
sure quite what is the appeal of reconstructing a master's painting. 
There is something vaguely archaeological about it.

Approximating the objects and their placement was relatively easy, which 
is a credit to the observational powers of Peiter Claesz.  Figuring out 
the lighting is trickier, and texturing is probably very open to 
interpretation.

This was all csg or iso's.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'take1.jpg' (36 KB)

Preview of image 'take1.jpg'