|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Since nobody came up with an answer, I thought I'd go ahead and record
what I discovered, just in case someone else has this problem down the road.
The image was rendered with an orthographic camera. After reading the
documentation, I was under the impression that most of that was
controlled by the up and right vectors, as opposed to the location. (As
a side note, I still don't completely understand the up and right
vectors... perhaps someone could spend a little more time on them in the
next release of the documentation?)
Long story made short, I put the camera inside the length of the
nacelles, which resulted in me getting a cross-section of them at the
plane of the camera, which was, naturally, dark, because no light
penetrates to the interior of the object.
Placing the camera further back gave a nearly identical image, because
the up and right vectors controlled the size of what was in it, but with
the full nacelle, which was properly lit.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |