Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> 
> In article <3D5E9C75.787CA1D3@attglobal.net> , "William F. Pokorny"
> <pok### [at] attglobalnet> wrote:
> 
> > The new isosurface object allows to directly render surfaces defined by
> > an arbitrary mathematical function.
> >
> > should probably read:
> >
> > The new isosurface object allows one to directly render surfaces defined
> > by arbitrary mathematical functions.
> 
> Nope, one isosurface function may indeed define more than one surface.  The
> current text is correct.

Well actually, as a matter of correct grammitical usage, his suggestion is
correct and will not affect the accuracy of the sentence. In this case
where "one" is not the number of surfaces rendered rather "one" is a person.

-- 
Ken Tyler

Post a reply to this message