Warp schrieb:
> Sebastian H. <seb### [at] webde> wrote:
> 
>>_Windows_:
>>Box                           79358745         9334253     11.76
>>Cone/Cylinder                 78379572         6515873      8.31
> 
> 
>>_Linux_:
>>Box                           77632067         9442332     12.16
>>Cone/Cylinder                 76120049         6536461      8.59
> 
> 
>   Are you completely and absolutely 100% sure that you are using the exact
> same benchmark scene and the exact same ini file settings (and I mean *all*
> settings)?

It was definitly the same .pov file I copied it into a seperate 
directory as the .ini file.
The differences you mentioned above made me wonder too but the deviation 
here wasn't very high.
A real huge difference is in "Priority queue insert:"
2226874 (Windows)
  724352 (Linux)
But what does that mean ?:-)

The other stuff of the POV output of both renderings were quite similar 
but I'am not sure about jitter (to ABX) (But since it was the same .ini 
file...).

>   If everything was exactly identical, I don't see any reason for those
> numbers to be different.

Yup this it what makes me wonder too.

A friend of mine who has a bit more knowledge about computer stuff in 
general (whatever that means)
said that an optimization that gives you half rendering time would be 
_very_ good (to Felix).

I don't know much about this stuff but I like linux and would prefer to 
play with POV here (Dualboot sucks if you can't share data without 
bending everything to fat).

I'll comapare it again take care of the parameters (hopefully a fault of 
mine :-) ), we'll see...

Thanks for comments
Sebastian H.

Post a reply to this message