Robert Chaffe wrote:
>>Mind that no_shadow does NOT accept a boolean - should this be changed ?
>
> For consistency, perhaps.  Apparently you were just curious and tried each
possibility?

Yes, for consistency.

Just curious ? No, but I like to check before posting. I mistakenly 
wrote no_shadow on (bcs of the inconsistency), checked the doc. Then see 
hollow with no [Bool] but remember using it with on and see the hollow 
on example farther in the page. And I think I remember seeing on with 
no_image and double_illuminate, so I tested to post a complete bug report...

[However that does not prevent me from making the most horrendous errors 
as in my [template] isosurface post... I think I now know how I 
constructed the false memory that made me post this aberation.]


Povingly,


Philippe

Post a reply to this message