|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Slime wrote:
> (1600x1200 preferably, 1024x768 doesn't really cover
> everyone, and we can always make it smaller if necessary =)
Windows does have a 'stretch to fit' option for wallpapers,
and uses bilinear resampling to do so, so a 1024x768 image
can look decent even at 1920 x 1440.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com
mirror: http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |