Samuel Benge wrote:

> The room is mothing to scream about yet, but those poser models are 
> expertly rendered! They don't have that 'plastic look' to them, plus the 
> light interaction with them seems to be very close to real.


Hmm might be simply the fact they're being lit full-tilt by 3
'spotlights' (ok point lights inside of hollowed spheres with
a hole for the light ^_^;)...usually people try subdued, even
lighting that reaches all parts evenly...tho I do have to give
major kudos to the poser model itself; I like its proportions
better than the default one's...it still can't pose worth crap
though, which is why the metal band in the middle's there;
moving the legs at all screws up the pelvic region.

Suggestions for room-filling?

> What media settings did you use?

Looksa somesin' lika zis:

#declare Water_Interior = material{
   texture{
     pigment{
       color rgbt <0.0, 0.5, 0.0, 0.8>
     }
   }
   interior{
     caustics 0.75
     media{
       samples 1,2
       variance 1.0/5.0
       ratio 0.071
       absorption rgb <0.75, 0.0, 0.0>
       emission rgb <0.0, 1.0, 0.8>
       scattering{
         4, rgb <0.642857, 0.857143, 0.785714> // rayleigh scattering
       }
       density{
         cylindrical
       }
     }
   }
}

-- 
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com
mirror: http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message