|
|
hmmm
thats another type
I was thinking of the zip-line webs and swinging ones
Sir Charles W. Shults III wrote:
> You would really need three or more points. Think "mandala" and you are
> most of the way there for cheap webs, think radial lines and onion and you have
> a good start for another cheap web, but the best solution is an iterative
> algorithm where you give 3 or 4 points and two spacing values.
> Hmm, this might be fun to write. I would use long, thin cylinders.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Chip Shults
> My robotics, space and CGI web page - http://home.cfl.rr.com/aichip
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|